Steven Molina Case study · Client work · Resorsi

Case study · Client work · Resorsi

Creator Video Review

Review desk for a creator draft: checked against the brief, returned with fixes and timestamps.

Client

Creator Match

Role

Forward Deployed AI Engineer

Built at

Resorsi

Watch the demo ↓

Overview

A synthetic clip is transcribed, checked against a fictional campaign brief, and returned as working points and fixes with timestamps. This is separate from creator search.

Wide social cut · 19s · with music

Watch it review

A shorter cut of the same Fernway review: one synthetic clip, checked against the brief.

Muted · unmute in the controls

The clip, creator, and campaign are fictional. The walkthrough does not send a notification, and it is not a recording of a client’s hosted review session.

How it works · real screenshots

The review desk

00 /06
Six screens from the walkthrough

Scroll to lift each one out.

From the upload queue to a review document with working points and fixes.

01 · Screenshot

Review queue

The queue for one fictional draft. The result is “Needs edits.”

Needs edits

02 · Screenshot

Processing

The draft while the video is processed and transcribed.

Queued for review

03 · Screenshot

Brief check

Six points pass and three need a fix, with timestamps. A passing point is the review judgment, not a guarantee.

6 pass · 3 to fix

04 · Screenshot

Transcript

The transcript of the synthetic clip, split into timed lines.

Timed lines

05 · Screenshot

Grounding

Cited moments are tied to transcript lines and to frames the reviewer saw. That check does not prove every visual judgment.

Frames the reviewer saw

06 · Screenshot

Review document

The review document lists working points and changes, and it does not catch every brief requirement.

What to change

Review queue
The queue for one fictional draft. The result is “Needs edits.” Needs edits
Processing
The draft while the video is processed and transcribed. Queued for review
Brief check
Six points pass and three need a fix, with timestamps. A passing point is the review judgment, not a guarantee. 6 pass · 3 to fix
Transcript
The transcript of the synthetic clip, split into timed lines. Timed lines
Grounding
Cited moments are tied to transcript lines and to frames the reviewer saw. That check does not prove every visual judgment. Frames the reviewer saw
Review document
The review document lists working points and changes, and it does not catch every brief requirement. What to change
How it works · real screenshots · 01—06

The review desk

Review queue
The queue for one fictional draft. The result is “Needs edits.” Needs edits
01 / 06

Review queue

The queue for one fictional draft. The result is “Needs edits.”

Processing
The draft while the video is processed and transcribed. Queued for review
02 / 06

Processing

The draft while the video is processed and transcribed.

Brief check
Six points pass and three need a fix, with timestamps. A passing point is the review judgment, not a guarantee. 6 pass · 3 to fix
03 / 06

Brief check

Six points pass and three need a fix, with timestamps. A passing point is the review judgment, not a guarantee.

Transcript
The transcript of the synthetic clip, split into timed lines. Timed lines
04 / 06

Transcript

The transcript of the synthetic clip, split into timed lines.

Grounding
Cited moments are tied to transcript lines and to frames the reviewer saw. That check does not prove every visual judgment. Frames the reviewer saw
05 / 06

Grounding

Cited moments are tied to transcript lines and to frames the reviewer saw. That check does not prove every visual judgment.

Review document
The review document lists working points and changes, and it does not catch every brief requirement. What to change
06 / 06

Review document

The review document lists working points and changes, and it does not catch every brief requirement.

Results · one fictional clip

Honest about what it missed.

6 working points
3 fixes, with timestamps
1 product-timing requirement missed

On the fictional Fernway clip, the review returned six working points and three fixes. Cited timestamps and quotations line up with the transcript and the frames the reviewer saw. That check does not confirm every visual judgment, and one product-timing requirement was missed. Built at Resorsi.

Full walkthrough · 46s · no audio

Every step, uncut

Upload, transcript, brief check, and the frames behind the cited moments. Captions are on screen. No narration or music.

Creator Video Review · walkthrough

Built at Resorsi

My role.

01

My role

Forward Deployed AI Engineer at Resorsi. Supported the review path that transcribes a creator draft and checks it against the brief.

02

A check, not a compliance guarantee

The review still treated a later product shot as meeting a brief that asked for the product earlier. The page does not claim the review caught every requirement.

03

Separate from creator search

Finding creators and reviewing a draft are different jobs. Search and shortlists live on the Creator Matching System page. This page is only the review desk.

Next case study · 04 of 08


Pharmacy Rebate Engine